BabyNamesTrends
Menu

2025 data, released 8 May 2026

Lanetta

Lanetta was not among the names given to 5 or more girls in 2025. Its best year was 1967, when it ranked 1836th with 41 babies. More babies were named Lanetta in the 1970s than in any other decade.

Meaning Not yet researched how we research meanings

Rank in 2025
Not rankedgirls
Babies in 2025
0girls
Girls and boys
No babies recorded in the last five years2021–2025
Peak year
196741 babies
Total since 1880
1,064babies recorded

Lanetta popularity since 1880

012.52537.550 1900192019401960198020002020
Girls Babies per year, US, from Social Security records. Years with fewer than 5 babies show as zero.
YearRank (girls)Babies (girls)
2025——
2020——
2010——
2000——
1990#7,61311
1980#4,42517
1970#2,09939
1960#2,86319
1950#2,02523
1940#2,24814
1930#4,3046
1920——
1910——
1900——
1890——
1880——

How popular is Lanetta, counting every spelling?

Lanetta has no other common spelling that sounds the same.

How old are people named Lanetta?

About 900 people born in the US named Lanetta are alive today, with a median age of 55; half are between 47 and 65. That makes Lanetta mostly worn by adults in their thirties to fifties.

0–910–1920–2930–3940–4950–5960–6970–7980–8990+
Estimated people alive in the US with the name, by age, mid-2026. The darker bar holds the median age.

Babies given the name each year (SSA) times the share of that birth year still alive (SSA life tables). Counts people born in the US only. Method.

Lanetta by state

How common Lanetta was among girls born in each state in 1965–1969, around its peak. In 49 states fewer than five girls a year got the name, too few for SSA to publish, so those states show as zero.

Alaska: fewer than 5 a yearAK–Maine: fewer than 5 a yearME–Wisconsin: fewer than 5 a yearWI–Vermont: fewer than 5 a yearVT–New Hampshire: fewer than 5 a yearNH–Washington: fewer than 5 a yearWA–Idaho: fewer than 5 a yearID–Montana: fewer than 5 a yearMT–North Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearND–Minnesota: fewer than 5 a yearMN–Illinois: fewer than 5 a yearIL–Michigan: fewer than 5 a yearMI–New York: fewer than 5 a yearNY–Massachusetts: fewer than 5 a yearMA–Oregon: fewer than 5 a yearOR–Nevada: fewer than 5 a yearNV–Wyoming: fewer than 5 a yearWY–South Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearSD–Iowa: fewer than 5 a yearIA–Indiana: fewer than 5 a yearIN–Ohio: fewer than 5 a yearOH–Pennsylvania: fewer than 5 a yearPA–New Jersey: fewer than 5 a yearNJ–Connecticut: fewer than 5 a yearCT–Rhode Island: fewer than 5 a yearRI–California: 0.01 per 1,000 babiesCA0.01Utah: fewer than 5 a yearUT–Colorado: fewer than 5 a yearCO–Nebraska: fewer than 5 a yearNE–Missouri: fewer than 5 a yearMO–Kentucky: fewer than 5 a yearKY–West Virginia: fewer than 5 a yearWV–Virginia: fewer than 5 a yearVA–Maryland: fewer than 5 a yearMD–Delaware: fewer than 5 a yearDE–Arizona: fewer than 5 a yearAZ–New Mexico: fewer than 5 a yearNM–Kansas: fewer than 5 a yearKS–Arkansas: fewer than 5 a yearAR–Tennessee: fewer than 5 a yearTN–North Carolina: fewer than 5 a yearNC–South Carolina: fewer than 5 a yearSC–District of Columbia: fewer than 5 a yearDC–Oklahoma: fewer than 5 a yearOK–Louisiana: fewer than 5 a yearLA–Mississippi: fewer than 5 a yearMS–Alabama: fewer than 5 a yearAL–Georgia: fewer than 5 a yearGA–Hawaii: fewer than 5 a yearHI–Texas: 0.01 per 1,000 babiesTX0.01Florida: fewer than 5 a yearFL–
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex, Lanetta, girls, 1965–1969. Darker means more common.

Names with a similar history

These names rose and fell in step with Lanetta: their share of US girls followed the most similar curve since 1880. If you like Lanetta, they share its era and feel.

Questions about the name Lanetta

How popular is the name Lanetta?

Lanetta was not among the names given to 5 or more girls in 2025. Its best year was 1967, when it ranked 1836th with 41 babies. More babies were named Lanetta in the 1970s than in any other decade.

Is Lanetta a boy or girl name?

No babies were given the name in 2021–2025. Historically it was given to 1,064 girls and 0 boys.

Where was Lanetta most popular?

In 1965–1969, Lanetta was most common in Texas (0.01 per 1,000 girls), followed by California and California.