BabyNamesTrends
Menu

2025 data, released 8 May 2026

Lisha

Lisha was the 14217th most popular name for girls in 2025, given to 6 babies. Its best year was 1960, when it ranked 598th with 275 babies. Over the last ten years it has moved down 337 places. More babies were named Lisha in the 1960s than in any other decade.

Meaning Not yet researched how we research meanings

Rank in 2025
#14,217 girls
Babies in 2025
6girls
Girls and boys
Almost always a girl’s name2021–2025
Peak year
1960275 babies
Total since 1880
2,388babies recorded

Lisha popularity since 1880

0125250375500 1900192019401960198020002020
Girls Babies per year, US, from Social Security records. Years with fewer than 5 babies show as zero.
YearRank (girls)Babies (girls)
2025#14,2176
2020——
2010#16,1516
2000#8,33512
1990#3,85827
1980#1,92456
1970#1,49667
1960#598275
1950——
1940——
1930——
1920——
1910——
1900——
1890——
1880——

How popular is Lisha, counting every spelling?

Lisha has no other common spelling that sounds the same.

How many kids will share the name Lisha?

6 of the 3,606,400 babies born in the US in 2025 were named Lisha (0.00 per 1,000 births). For a girl named Lisha born in 2025, the chance that another child with the same name is in a class of 20 children the same age is under 1 in 50. If every grade liked the name as much as the 2025 babies do, only about one elementary school in 1,368 (of 430 pupils) would have a child named Lisha.

Chance of another Lisha in a class of 20under 1 in 50US, born 2025

Shares of all registered births (NCHS); classes assumed to be children born the same year. How we estimate this.

How old are people named Lisha?

About 2,200 people born in the US named Lisha are alive today, with a median age of 56; half are between 44 and 64. That makes Lisha a name most people associate with older generations.

0–910–1920–2930–3940–4950–5960–6970–7980–8990+
Estimated people alive in the US with the name, by age, mid-2026. The darker bar holds the median age.

Babies given the name each year (SSA) times the share of that birth year still alive (SSA life tables). Counts people born in the US only. Method.

Lisha by state

How common Lisha was among girls born in each state in 1958–1962, around its peak. It is notably more common than nationally in Louisiana (4.4×), Kentucky (3.4×), Virginia (2.9×), Tennessee (2.8×), South Carolina (2.6×). In 29 states fewer than five girls a year got the name, too few for SSA to publish, so those states show as zero.

Alaska: fewer than 5 a yearAK–Maine: fewer than 5 a yearME–Wisconsin: fewer than 5 a yearWI–Vermont: fewer than 5 a yearVT–New Hampshire: fewer than 5 a yearNH–Washington: fewer than 5 a yearWA–Idaho: fewer than 5 a yearID–Montana: fewer than 5 a yearMT–North Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearND–Minnesota: 0.03 per 1,000 babiesMN0.03Illinois: 0.02 per 1,000 babiesIL0.02Michigan: 0.05 per 1,000 babiesMI0.05New York: 0.04 per 1,000 babiesNY0.04Massachusetts: fewer than 5 a yearMA–Oregon: fewer than 5 a yearOR–Nevada: fewer than 5 a yearNV–Wyoming: fewer than 5 a yearWY–South Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearSD–Iowa: fewer than 5 a yearIA–Indiana: 0.03 per 1,000 babiesIN0.03Ohio: 0.06 per 1,000 babiesOH0.06Pennsylvania: 0.04 per 1,000 babiesPA0.04New Jersey: fewer than 5 a yearNJ–Connecticut: fewer than 5 a yearCT–Rhode Island: fewer than 5 a yearRI–California: 0.03 per 1,000 babiesCA0.03Utah: fewer than 5 a yearUT–Colorado: fewer than 5 a yearCO–Nebraska: fewer than 5 a yearNE–Missouri: 0.05 per 1,000 babiesMO0.05Kentucky: 0.23 per 1,000 babiesKY0.23West Virginia: 0.19 per 1,000 babiesWV0.19Virginia: 0.20 per 1,000 babiesVA0.20Maryland: 0.07 per 1,000 babiesMD0.07Delaware: fewer than 5 a yearDE–Arizona: fewer than 5 a yearAZ–New Mexico: fewer than 5 a yearNM–Kansas: fewer than 5 a yearKS–Arkansas: fewer than 5 a yearAR–Tennessee: 0.19 per 1,000 babiesTN0.19North Carolina: 0.12 per 1,000 babiesNC0.12South Carolina: 0.18 per 1,000 babiesSC0.18District of Columbia: fewer than 5 a yearDC–Oklahoma: fewer than 5 a yearOK–Louisiana: 0.29 per 1,000 babiesLA0.29Mississippi: 0.15 per 1,000 babiesMS0.15Alabama: 0.14 per 1,000 babiesAL0.14Georgia: 0.11 per 1,000 babiesGA0.11Hawaii: fewer than 5 a yearHI–Texas: 0.06 per 1,000 babiesTX0.06Florida: 0.08 per 1,000 babiesFL0.08
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex, Lisha, girls, 1958–1962. Darker means more common.

Names with a similar history

These names rose and fell in step with Lisha: their share of US girls followed the most similar curve since 1880. If you like Lisha, they share its era and feel.

Questions about the name Lisha

How popular is the name Lisha?

Lisha was the 14217th most popular name for girls in 2025, given to 6 babies. Its best year was 1960, when it ranked 598th with 275 babies. Over the last ten years it has moved down 337 places. More babies were named Lisha in the 1960s than in any other decade.

Is Lisha a boy or girl name?

In 2021–2025, almost always a girl’s name given the name Lisha in the US.

Where was Lisha most popular?

In 1958–1962, Lisha was most common in Louisiana (0.29 per 1,000 girls), followed by Kentucky and Virginia.