BabyNamesTrends
Menu

2025 data, released 8 May 2026

2025 data, released 8 May 2026

Lonnell

Lonnell was not among the names given to 5 or more boys in 2025. Its best year was 1970, when it ranked 1482nd with 33 babies. More babies were named Lonnell in the 1970s than in any other decade.

Meaning Not yet researched how we research meanings

Rank in 2025
Not rankedboys
Babies in 2025
0boys
Girls and boys
Almost always a boy’s name2021–2025
Peak year
197033 babies
Total since 1880
1,115babies recorded

Lonnell popularity since 1880

012.52537.550 1900192019401960198020002020
Boys Babies per year, US, from Social Security records. Years with fewer than 5 babies show as zero.
YearRank (boys)Babies (boys)
2025——
2020#10,1897
2010#10,3337
2000#4,94515
1990#2,67125
1980#2,08826
1970#1,48233
1960#1,95218
1950#1,98715
1940#3,7445
1930——
1920——
1910——
1900——
1890——
1880——

How popular is Lonnell, counting every spelling?

Lonnell has no other common spelling that sounds the same.

How old are people named Lonnell?

About 1,000 people born in the US named Lonnell are alive today, with a median age of 46; half are between 32 and 57. That makes Lonnell mostly worn by adults in their thirties to fifties.

0–910–1920–2930–3940–4950–5960–6970–7980–8990+
Estimated people alive in the US with the name, by age, mid-2026. The darker bar holds the median age.

Babies given the name each year (SSA) times the share of that birth year still alive (SSA life tables). Counts people born in the US only. Method.

Lonnell by state

How common Lonnell was among boys born in each state in 1968–1972, around its peak. In 49 states fewer than five boys a year got the name, too few for SSA to publish, so those states show as zero.

Alaska: fewer than 5 a yearAK–Maine: fewer than 5 a yearME–Wisconsin: fewer than 5 a yearWI–Vermont: fewer than 5 a yearVT–New Hampshire: fewer than 5 a yearNH–Washington: fewer than 5 a yearWA–Idaho: fewer than 5 a yearID–Montana: fewer than 5 a yearMT–North Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearND–Minnesota: fewer than 5 a yearMN–Illinois: fewer than 5 a yearIL–Michigan: fewer than 5 a yearMI–New York: fewer than 5 a yearNY–Massachusetts: fewer than 5 a yearMA–Oregon: fewer than 5 a yearOR–Nevada: fewer than 5 a yearNV–Wyoming: fewer than 5 a yearWY–South Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearSD–Iowa: fewer than 5 a yearIA–Indiana: fewer than 5 a yearIN–Ohio: fewer than 5 a yearOH–Pennsylvania: fewer than 5 a yearPA–New Jersey: fewer than 5 a yearNJ–Connecticut: fewer than 5 a yearCT–Rhode Island: fewer than 5 a yearRI–California: 0.02 per 1,000 babiesCA0.02Utah: fewer than 5 a yearUT–Colorado: fewer than 5 a yearCO–Nebraska: fewer than 5 a yearNE–Missouri: 0.03 per 1,000 babiesMO0.03Kentucky: fewer than 5 a yearKY–West Virginia: fewer than 5 a yearWV–Virginia: fewer than 5 a yearVA–Maryland: fewer than 5 a yearMD–Delaware: fewer than 5 a yearDE–Arizona: fewer than 5 a yearAZ–New Mexico: fewer than 5 a yearNM–Kansas: fewer than 5 a yearKS–Arkansas: fewer than 5 a yearAR–Tennessee: fewer than 5 a yearTN–North Carolina: fewer than 5 a yearNC–South Carolina: fewer than 5 a yearSC–District of Columbia: fewer than 5 a yearDC–Oklahoma: fewer than 5 a yearOK–Louisiana: fewer than 5 a yearLA–Mississippi: fewer than 5 a yearMS–Alabama: fewer than 5 a yearAL–Georgia: fewer than 5 a yearGA–Hawaii: fewer than 5 a yearHI–Texas: fewer than 5 a yearTX–Florida: fewer than 5 a yearFL–
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex, Lonnell, boys, 1968–1972. Darker means more common.

Names with a similar history

These names rose and fell in step with Lonnell: their share of US boys followed the most similar curve since 1880. If you like Lonnell, they share its era and feel.

Questions about the name Lonnell

How popular is the name Lonnell?

Lonnell was not among the names given to 5 or more boys in 2025. Its best year was 1970, when it ranked 1482nd with 33 babies. More babies were named Lonnell in the 1970s than in any other decade.

Is Lonnell a boy or girl name?

In 2021–2025, almost always a boy’s name given the name Lonnell in the US.

Where was Lonnell most popular?

In 1968–1972, Lonnell was most common in Missouri (0.03 per 1,000 boys), followed by California and California.