BabyNamesTrends
Menu

2025 data, released 8 May 2026

2025 data, released 8 May 2026

Mafalda

Mafalda was not among the names given to 5 or more girls in 2025. Its best year was 1915, when it ranked 758th; the most babies were born in 1925 (85). More babies were named Mafalda in the 1920s than in any other decade.

Meaning Not yet researched how we research meanings

Rank in 2025
Not rankedgirls
Babies in 2025
0girls
Girls and boys
No babies recorded in the last five years2021–2025
Peak year
192585 babies
Total since 1880
1,279babies recorded

Mafalda popularity since 1880

0255075100 1900192019401960198020002020
Girls Babies per year, US, from Social Security records. Years with fewer than 5 babies show as zero.
YearRank (girls)Babies (girls)
2025——
2020——
2010——
2000——
1990——
1980——
1970——
1960——
1950——
1940——
1930#1,36232
1920#1,00155
1910#2,0507
1900——
1890——
1880——

How popular is Mafalda, counting every spelling?

Mafalda has no other common spelling that sounds the same.

Mafalda by state

How common Mafalda was among girls born in each state in 1923–1927, around its peak. It is notably more common than nationally in Rhode Island (11.9×), New Jersey (4.6×), Massachusetts (3.9×), New York (3.0×), Pennsylvania (2.8×). In 44 states fewer than five girls a year got the name, too few for SSA to publish, so those states show as zero.

Alaska: fewer than 5 a yearAK–Maine: fewer than 5 a yearME–Wisconsin: fewer than 5 a yearWI–Vermont: fewer than 5 a yearVT–New Hampshire: fewer than 5 a yearNH–Washington: fewer than 5 a yearWA–Idaho: fewer than 5 a yearID–Montana: fewer than 5 a yearMT–North Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearND–Minnesota: fewer than 5 a yearMN–Illinois: 0.02 per 1,000 babiesIL0.02Michigan: fewer than 5 a yearMI–New York: 0.19 per 1,000 babiesNY0.19Massachusetts: 0.24 per 1,000 babiesMA0.24Oregon: fewer than 5 a yearOR–Nevada: fewer than 5 a yearNV–Wyoming: fewer than 5 a yearWY–South Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearSD–Iowa: fewer than 5 a yearIA–Indiana: fewer than 5 a yearIN–Ohio: fewer than 5 a yearOH–Pennsylvania: 0.18 per 1,000 babiesPA0.18New Jersey: 0.29 per 1,000 babiesNJ0.29Connecticut: 0.18 per 1,000 babiesCT0.18Rhode Island: 0.75 per 1,000 babiesRI0.75California: fewer than 5 a yearCA–Utah: fewer than 5 a yearUT–Colorado: fewer than 5 a yearCO–Nebraska: fewer than 5 a yearNE–Missouri: fewer than 5 a yearMO–Kentucky: fewer than 5 a yearKY–West Virginia: fewer than 5 a yearWV–Virginia: fewer than 5 a yearVA–Maryland: fewer than 5 a yearMD–Delaware: fewer than 5 a yearDE–Arizona: fewer than 5 a yearAZ–New Mexico: fewer than 5 a yearNM–Kansas: fewer than 5 a yearKS–Arkansas: fewer than 5 a yearAR–Tennessee: fewer than 5 a yearTN–North Carolina: fewer than 5 a yearNC–South Carolina: fewer than 5 a yearSC–District of Columbia: fewer than 5 a yearDC–Oklahoma: fewer than 5 a yearOK–Louisiana: fewer than 5 a yearLA–Mississippi: fewer than 5 a yearMS–Alabama: fewer than 5 a yearAL–Georgia: fewer than 5 a yearGA–Hawaii: fewer than 5 a yearHI–Texas: fewer than 5 a yearTX–Florida: fewer than 5 a yearFL–
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex, Mafalda, girls, 1923–1927. Darker means more common.

Names with a similar history

These names rose and fell in step with Mafalda: their share of US girls followed the most similar curve since 1880. If you like Mafalda, they share its era and feel.

Questions about the name Mafalda

How popular is the name Mafalda?

Mafalda was not among the names given to 5 or more girls in 2025. Its best year was 1915, when it ranked 758th; the most babies were born in 1925 (85). More babies were named Mafalda in the 1920s than in any other decade.

Is Mafalda a boy or girl name?

No babies were given the name in 2021–2025. Historically it was given to 1,279 girls and 0 boys.

Where was Mafalda most popular?

In 1923–1927, Mafalda was most common in Rhode Island (0.75 per 1,000 girls), followed by New Jersey and Massachusetts.