BabyNamesTrends
Menu

2025 data, released 8 May 2026

Neola

Neola was not among the names given to 5 or more girls in 2025. Its best year was 1905, when it ranked 952nd; the most babies were born in 1918 (40). More babies were named Neola in the 1920s than in any other decade.

Meaning Not yet researched how we research meanings

Rank in 2025
Not rankedgirls
Babies in 2025
0girls
Girls and boys
Almost always a girl’s name2021–2025
Peak year
191840 babies
Total since 1880
1,014babies recorded

Neola popularity since 1880

012.52537.550 1900192019401960198020002020
Girls Babies per year, US, from Social Security records. Years with fewer than 5 babies show as zero.
YearRank (girls)Babies (girls)
2025——
2020——
2010——
2000——
1990——
1980——
1970——
1960——
1950——
1940#3,7567
1930#1,85420
1920#1,39533
1910#1,31513
1900#1,20911
1890——
1880——

How popular is Neola, counting every spelling?

Neola has no other common spelling that sounds the same.

How old are people named Neola?

About 100 people born in the US named Neola are alive today, with a median age of 83; half are between 73 and 88. That makes Neola a name most people associate with older generations.

0–910–1920–2930–3940–4950–5960–6970–7980–8990+
Estimated people alive in the US with the name, by age, mid-2026. The darker bar holds the median age.

Babies given the name each year (SSA) times the share of that birth year still alive (SSA life tables). Counts people born in the US only. Method.

Neola by state

How common Neola was among girls born in each state in 1916–1920, around its peak. In 50 states fewer than five girls a year got the name, too few for SSA to publish, so those states show as zero.

Alaska: fewer than 5 a yearAK–Maine: fewer than 5 a yearME–Wisconsin: fewer than 5 a yearWI–Vermont: fewer than 5 a yearVT–New Hampshire: fewer than 5 a yearNH–Washington: fewer than 5 a yearWA–Idaho: fewer than 5 a yearID–Montana: fewer than 5 a yearMT–North Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearND–Minnesota: fewer than 5 a yearMN–Illinois: fewer than 5 a yearIL–Michigan: fewer than 5 a yearMI–New York: fewer than 5 a yearNY–Massachusetts: fewer than 5 a yearMA–Oregon: fewer than 5 a yearOR–Nevada: fewer than 5 a yearNV–Wyoming: fewer than 5 a yearWY–South Dakota: fewer than 5 a yearSD–Iowa: 0.11 per 1,000 babiesIA0.11Indiana: fewer than 5 a yearIN–Ohio: fewer than 5 a yearOH–Pennsylvania: fewer than 5 a yearPA–New Jersey: fewer than 5 a yearNJ–Connecticut: fewer than 5 a yearCT–Rhode Island: fewer than 5 a yearRI–California: fewer than 5 a yearCA–Utah: fewer than 5 a yearUT–Colorado: fewer than 5 a yearCO–Nebraska: fewer than 5 a yearNE–Missouri: fewer than 5 a yearMO–Kentucky: fewer than 5 a yearKY–West Virginia: fewer than 5 a yearWV–Virginia: fewer than 5 a yearVA–Maryland: fewer than 5 a yearMD–Delaware: fewer than 5 a yearDE–Arizona: fewer than 5 a yearAZ–New Mexico: fewer than 5 a yearNM–Kansas: fewer than 5 a yearKS–Arkansas: fewer than 5 a yearAR–Tennessee: fewer than 5 a yearTN–North Carolina: fewer than 5 a yearNC–South Carolina: fewer than 5 a yearSC–District of Columbia: fewer than 5 a yearDC–Oklahoma: fewer than 5 a yearOK–Louisiana: fewer than 5 a yearLA–Mississippi: fewer than 5 a yearMS–Alabama: fewer than 5 a yearAL–Georgia: fewer than 5 a yearGA–Hawaii: fewer than 5 a yearHI–Texas: fewer than 5 a yearTX–Florida: fewer than 5 a yearFL–
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex, Neola, girls, 1916–1920. Darker means more common.

Names with a similar history

These names rose and fell in step with Neola: their share of US girls followed the most similar curve since 1880. If you like Neola, they share its era and feel.

Questions about the name Neola

How popular is the name Neola?

Neola was not among the names given to 5 or more girls in 2025. Its best year was 1905, when it ranked 952nd; the most babies were born in 1918 (40). More babies were named Neola in the 1920s than in any other decade.

Is Neola a boy or girl name?

In 2021–2025, almost always a girl’s name given the name Neola in the US.

Where was Neola most popular?

In 1916–1920, Neola was most common in Iowa (0.11 per 1,000 girls).